After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies have become reviving these types of systems. From lie diagnosis tools examined at the edge to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to find the way these systems and to pursue their legal right for safeguard.

It also displays how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from being able to access the programs of protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects so, who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: even though they assistance to expedite the asylum process, they also produce it difficult for refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.